Epping Forest News RSS Feed


EPPING: Permission granted for 132 new homes

3:06pm Thursday 13th November 2008

comment Comments (4)   Have your say »


CONTROVERSIAL plans to build 132 homes on old hospital land have finally been granted.

Bellway Homes has been looking to build on the site of Saint Margaret’s Hospital, in The Plain, Epping, for some time and had an application for a 351 home development rejected in June this year.

The new scheme drew almost universal agreement as an improvement but still faced opposition from the City of London, Epping Town Council and many local residents.

Speaking at the district council’s planning committee, town councillor Ken Avey said: “This development when completed will cause the town of Epping more harm than good, and my council has raised concerns about the lack of highway car parking offered and car parks for all day parking at the underground station.

“However, my council have reluctantly agreed not to object to this application, but we do request that something should be done to mitigate these problems as soon as possible.

Bellway Homes spokesman Michael Smith said: “The [previous] refusal was based on reasons of design and I think we can all say a 60 per cent reduction goes a long way to reducing those problems. This is an excellent site and Bellway is very keen to build on it, even in the current climate.”

Councillors were unanimous in their approval of the new design.

Council leader Di Collins said: “This is a huge improvement on what we had before. I think the residents of Epping have worked well to lower the number of houses. We do need more houses in Epping and whether you like it or not many of our younger families cannot find housing.”

Speaking to the Guardian after the meeting Jeanette Goatcher, of The Plain, who chaired the campaign group Plainly Say No, said she accepted the compromise decision, but maintained the development would be bad for the town.

She said: “It won’t be good. There’ll be too much traffic, schools packed, shops packed. The whole process has been about finding a compromise. I’m sure the people of Epping, to be perfectly honest, say no they didn’t want the development at all. It is a historic town it does have infrastructure and other problems and it’s pretty packed out.

“It’s obviously a huge improvement on the previous application of 351 homes. Various aspects have been changed for the better. Some still need improvement, but we’ve been reasonably successful.

“I think the campaign has done a great deal and made an awful lot of difference. It’s a victory of a sort.”


Your Say Your Guardian

Morris Hickey, Redbridge says...
10:14am Fri 14 Nov 08

Well I just hope that the district council's planning committee has secured an infinitely better design than the crap development by Bellway on the old King George site at Newbury Park.

I think it is highly significant that the Town Council remains opposed to the plans that have been pushed through by those living elsewhere - NIMBYs included. Epping will yet go the way of Brentwood.

danbrett, Loughton says...
12:03pm Fri 14 Nov 08

132 homes is a huge development and will have a significant impact on Epping, more so than the proposed Gypsy and Travellers sites. So why the ire against the Gypsies, yet the District Council is unanimously in favour of this development? A Gypsy site can be fairly quickly returned to its previous condition, but building homes is irreversible. And there is absolutely no guarantee that any young families in Epping will be able to afford the houses on this site. The privatisation of council housing stock, particularly through the right-to-buy, has ensured the most needy and poorest families are packed off to B&Bs as private home ownership has grown exponentially - a debt phenomenon that is now costing us all. So why the contradiction between the attitude towards Gypsies and the attitude towards this development? It is not simply about ethnicity and culture, although that undoubtedly plays a part. It is primarily about the gradual gentrification of the area that favours a certain class of people above another - and why areas such as Debden have been allowed to decay in the way they have.

danbrett, Loughton says...
2:43pm Fri 14 Nov 08

The council leader says that the development will benefit families in Epping. I'd like to know the proportion of the development allocated to social housing for local families. I'd like to know how much more funding will be available for public services, how many more teachers will be recruited, how GP practices will respond to increased demand, how roads will be adapted for increased traffic flow, etc. Residents say the town is already "packed out", so how will the various tiers of government respond to increased demand from this development and the many others that are likely to follow it in Epping and around the district? Because as far as I can see, public services in the district are at bursting point and the infrastructure is under considerable strain.

rod stewarts gardener, johnmail94@yahoo.com says...
5:06pm Fri 21 Nov 08

A BIT MORE GARDENING WORK FOR ME ,,,??

Your sayYour Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE East London and West Essex Guardian Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

LOCAL LINKS


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »