Waltham Forest News RSS Feed


WALTHAM FOREST: Legal wrangle forces council home work rethink

4:29pm Tuesday 18th November 2008

comment Comments (3)   Have your say »


THOUSANDS of residents must continue to live in sub-standard council homes after a legal wrangle forced a rethink on improvement work.

Ascham Homes admits it will have to make changes to the way it implements the Decent Homes programme after a landmark ruling by the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) said it had misled thousands of leaseholders.

In a letter to residents the company admitted essential work to bring thousands of homes up to a basic standard will be “rescheduled”.

This is likely to result in Ascham Homes falling further behind a target set by the Government.

The arms length management organisation plans to appeal the LVT's decision but admits the outcome will not be known for at least a year.

The company says it will not issue any new invoices to leaseholders until the legal process has been conculded.

This has left many residents who have purchased former council-owned properties unsure whether they will have to pay bills of up to £30,000 for work many say is unnecessary.

The LVT said Ascham Homes had failed to let leaseholders know about the estimated costs of work being carried out after letters were sent with the wrong information.

Ascham Homes were criticised for failing to consult leaseholders properly until November 2007, despite knowing about the situation in 2005.

Melanie Briggs, a leaseholder in Stocksfield Road, Walthamstow, said: "I find it somewhat depressing that yet more public money is being plundered to appeal the LVT decision.

"Ascham Homes admitted back in September that they have carried out no surveys at all, and yet they still seem determined to financially cripple leaseholders throughout the borough despite the fact the economy has significantly worsened since July, when we first raised these concerns."

Another Walthamstow leaseholder, Michael McGough, added: “Ascham Homes has spent a lot of money already on what I believe are unnecessary repairs.

"They just seem to drive work through regardless. I do worry how I am going to pay for work I don't think needs doing. Now I have to wait for at least a year to find out whether I will have to pay."

Ascham Homes were awarded two stars by the Audit Commission two years ago and was given £90 million of taxpayers’ money to bring all council homes up to standard by 2010.

A recent cabinet report highlighted council concern and disappointment about the LVT ruling and the failure to meet decent homes targets.

An Ascham Homes spokeswoman said: “We are committed to improving the quality of housing and services provided to tenants in Waltham Forest, and ensuring their homes are decent is a vital part of that commitment.”


Your Say Your Guardian

tiglet, Chingford says...
5:22pm Tue 18 Nov 08

The fact is that Ascham Homes were not given any money. They were given permission to borrow £90 million. That money will have to be paid back at some point.

Technomist, Walthamstow says...
11:22am Wed 19 Nov 08

Ascham failed to let leaseholders know about estimated costs to work being carried out after letters were sent to numerous householders with 'the wrong information'.

Apparently, in 2005, they sent out letters to leaseholders saying that their homes were to be improved through the council's ten-year capital plan. No such a plan existed. Someone somewhere went out of their way to make things up about what Ascham Homes up to, or at the most charitable was utterly incompetent and out of their depth. These letters were basically part of a process to get money off the leaseholders under false pretenses.

A Ms Murphie, Head of the Right to Buy and Leasehold Services team since 1994, said to the Tribunal she was given the wording of letters to the leaseholders by the Building Consultancy Services Ltd (BCS) but signed them without being sure whether or not the proposals existed.

What is it about sue of the word 'consultancy' in Waltham Forest that tells people that something dodgy is going on? Quite apart from wondering how the Head of such an important part of the organisation could be so ignorant and cavalier about her job, I would love to know what BCS were paid for the services she claimed she was reliant upon, who decided to use BCS, and why?

I would also be interested to know exactly who was getting the contracts for the building works the leaseholders were to be asked to pay for, and how and why were such contractors involved?

How much money has been 'wasted' is unclear (though I think there are a few people who would tend to agree with Melanie Briggs and ask whether in fact what we have here is public money is being plundered).

Who ultimately benefited from this 'mismanagement' other than the lawyers is also unclear. We do know who is suffering - the tenants, taxpayers and residents of Waltham Forest.

There are many unanswered questions about Ascham Homes, not least, what on earth their Board (including Naz Sarkar, Eric Williams, Peter Woollcott and Paul Olford, who is Chair) think they are doing employing people to run such an important organisation when their defense in court was, basically, that they don't know what they are doing. The board of Ascham should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

MICHAEL MCGOUGH, loughton says...
4:42pm Wed 19 Nov 08

I trust the board are now considering their position.The Tribunal were dismayed that senior officers of Ascham Homes did not attend the Tribunal.
Clearly the award of a primary school like two stars by the Audit Commission is no badge of merit but a typical Labour tick box target led exercise to give spurious credibility to the inept.

Your sayYour Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE East London and West Essex Guardian Series account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

LOCAL LINKS


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »